
A six-week study by HiQ Tyres & Autocare suggests nearly one in five vehicles aged five years or younger failed their MOT at the first attempt. The snapshot, drawn from a representative sample of MOT tests across HiQ locations nationwide, challenges the idea that newer cars are inherently more roadworthy. HiQ says many failures were avoidable with routine checks, highlighting tyres, lamps and wipers as recurring issues.
“At HiQ, we want to keep motorists safe driving on the road. Our findings suggest a worrying level of complacency when it comes to the maintenance of newer vehicles, with many drivers mistakenly assuming that age alone guarantees roadworthiness. Sadly, that is not always the case. An MOT failure often points to there being critical safety issues with vehicles and can result in costly repairs and the need for a re-test.” - Craig Sprigmore, Retail Director UK & Ireland, HiQ Tyres & Autocare.
The results indicate behaviour, not age alone, is driving a chunk of first-time MOT failures. Routine checks on tyre tread/pressure, lights and wipers regularly prevent avoidable fails. UK-wide datasets from the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency also show these items are persistent contributors to failure, reinforcing the message that simple maintenance reduces risk.
“In reality, many of the most common reasons for MOT failure, such as worn tyres, faulty lamps or problems with wipers and washers, can be avoided entirely with routine maintenance checks.” — Craig Sprigmore, HiQ Tyres & Autocare.
The figures cited are from a HiQ six-week sample across its locations and are not a national DVSA pass-rate average.

Tagged with: MOT failure rates, MOT pass rates, tyre safety, tyre tread depth, vehicle maintenance, wiper faults, headlamp checks, HiQ Tyres & Autocare, DVSA data, UK road safety
Editorial Standards & Disclaimer
Tyre News Media is an independent industry publication. Our reporting is based on information available at the time of publication, including company announcements, regulatory filings, official data, research and other sources considered reliable.
Articles may include independent analysis and editorial interpretation. Where appropriate, company statements and third-party claims are attributed to their source. Analysis, estimates and forward-looking observations should not be read as statements of established fact.
Tyre News Media takes reasonable steps to ensure accuracy but welcomes corrections, clarifications and responses from organisations or individuals covered in our reporting. If you believe information is inaccurate or requires clarification, please contact info@tyrenews.co.uk. Material errors will be corrected as appropriate.
Commercial relationships, advertising and sponsorship do not determine Tyre News Media's editorial coverage or conclusions.
